Legal Opinion
Dunn v. Passmore
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 10, 1996PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Vehicle and Traffic Law § 313 specifies the format and content of notices of cancellation of automobile liability insurance policies, and the failure to strictly comply with its provisions invalidates such notices (Barile v Kavanaugh, 67 NY2d 392, 399; Matter of Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. [Stollerman-Banner Cas. Co.], 50 NY2d 895, affg 70 AD2d 643). 15 NYCRR 34.6 (b) requires that the cancellation notice include a specification that suspension of the automobile registration can be avoided by payment of a civil penalty of $6 per day for each day the insurance coverage is not in effect. The notice…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Barile v. KavanaughNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- In re the Arbitration between Liberty Mutual Insurance & StollermanNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Wausau Insurance v. RamosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Allstate Insurance v. SatchellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- USAA Casualty Insurance v. BelizaireAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
3Cited by4 opinions
- American Home Assurance Co. v. ChinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Progressive Northeastern Insurance v. RobbinsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- In re Material Damage Adjustment Corp. v. KingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Wilson v. Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996