Legal Opinion
Allstate Insurance v. Satchell
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 14, 1996PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Vehicle and Traffic Law § 313 specifies format and content for notices of cancellation of automobile insurance liability policies, and the failure to strictly comply with its provisions invalidates such notice (Barile v Kavanaugh, 67 NY2d 392, 399; Matter of Liberty Mut. Ins. Co. [Stollerman], 50 NY2d 895, affg for reasons stated at 70 AD2d 643; Matter of Worldwide Underwriters Ins. Co. v Lumbermens Mut. Cas. Co., 181 AD2d 784, 786; Matter of Wausau Ins. Cos. v Harpaul, 90 AD2d 711).
15 NYCRR 34.6 (b) requires that the cancellation notice include a specification that suspension of the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Barile v. KavanaughNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- In re the Arbitration between Liberty Mutual Insurance & StollermanNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Wausau Insurance v. RamosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Worldwide Underwriters Insurance v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- USAA Casualty Insurance v. BelizaireAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Dunn v. PassmoreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Foster v. AbramsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
- Aiu Insurance v. MarcianteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004