Legal Opinion

Farmers Nat. Bank of Somerset v. Bolton

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided October 13, 1936PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Ratliff

— Reversing.

Tbis is tbe second appeal in tbis case. Tbe issues ■and the facts supporting them are stated in our former ■opinion. See Bolton v. Sears, 257 Ky. 676, 78 S. W. (2d) 914, 916. It is unnecessary to repeat them.

In -our .former opinion we stated:

“Bolton should have had more carefully made surveys of his part of the Ruark land than he had, he-should have shown more definitely and exactly the location of the house from which he was evicted, still he had some evidence of those things that if' believed by the jury would have sustained a verdict in his…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kentucky Utilities Co. v. HurstCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1925
  2. Fenton Dry Cleaning & Dyeing Co. v. HamiltonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
  3. Bolton v. SearsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1935
  4. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929
  5. Louisville Cooperage Co. v. Collins Et Ux.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bolton v. Farmers Nat. Bank of SomersetCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API