Legal Opinion
Arthur v. Litton Loan Servicing LP
District Court, E.D. Tennessee
Decided November 19, 2002No. 1:02-cv-00285PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
EDGAR, Chief Judge.
Defendants Litton Loan Servicing LP (“Litton”) and U.S. Bank National Association (“U.S.Bank”) removed this case from the Chancery Court in Hamilton County, Tennessee. There are two motions before the Court. Plaintiffs move to remand pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c) contending that Litton has been served with process and Litton failed to timely file the notice of removal within the 30-day time limit provided in 28 U.S.C. § 1446(b). [Court File No. 8], Litton and U.S. Bank oppose the motion.
After reviewing the record, the Court concludes the plaintiffs’…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Murphy Brothers, Inc. v. Michetti Pipe Stringing, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Omni Capital International, Ltd. v. Rudolf Wolff & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Friedman v. Estate of PresserCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1991
- Bill Ransom v. Frances Hugh Brennan, of the Estate of William J. Brennan,deceasedCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
- Katherine Amen v. City of Dearborn, a Municipal Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1976
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Hall v. HaynesTennessee Supreme Court · 2010
- Watanabe v. LankfordDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2010
- Middlebrooks v. Godwin CorporationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Cored, LLC v. Steve HatcherCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 2020
- Guerrero v. WilliamsDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2025
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.