Legal Opinion
Watanabe v. Lankford
District Court, D. Hawaii
Decided January 15, 2010No. Civ. 09-00199 SPK-LEKPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION
SAMUEL P. KING, Senior District Judge.
A Findings and Recommendation was filed and served on all parties on December 14, 2009, and no objections were filed. Accordingly, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and LR 74.2, the “Findings and Recommendation to Deny Plaintiffs’ Motion for Remand” are adopted as the opinion and order of this Court.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION TO DENY PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR REMAND
LESLIE E. KOBAYASHI, United States Magistrate Judge.
Before the Court, pursuant to a designation by Senior United States District…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Murphy Brothers, Inc. v. Michetti Pipe Stringing, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Lapides v. Board of Regents of Univ. System of Ga.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Emrich v. Touche Ross & Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- California ex rel Lockyer v. Dynegy, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. MartinSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Gentile v. Biogen Idec, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2013
- Middlebrooks v. Godwin CorporationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Magallan v. Zurich American Insurance Co.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2017
- Coger v. Nationwide Agribusiness Ins. Co.District Court, E.D. California · 2024
- Glenn v. Dexcom, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2023
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.