Legal Opinion

Hanners v. Woodruff

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided April 15, 1987No. 44329PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Marshall, Chief Justice.

Hanners contracted to purchase from Burson a portion of a tract of land which Burson was to buy from the Vaughans. Thereafter, Burson contracted to sell to Woodruff the entire tract — including the portion he previously had contracted to sell to Hanners. The Vaughans-to-Burson and Burson-to-Woodruff contracts were closed simultaneously, with a conveyance directly from the Vaughans to Woodruff. Hanners filed this action seeking specific performance from Woodruff or damages from Burson and Woodruff. The trial court sustained Burson’s and Woodruff’s motions for summary…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Crawford v. VernerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  2. Blumberg v. NathanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940
  3. Grant v. Fourth Nat. Bank of ColumbusSupreme Court of Georgia · 1972
  4. Gress Lumber Co. v. CoodySupreme Court of Georgia · 1894
  5. Wisener v. GulledgeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Singh v. Sterling United, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2014
  2. Murdock v. WardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1996
  3. Martin v. PattonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  4. Herman Homes, Inc. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
  5. L. S. Land Co. v. BurnsSupreme Court of Georgia · 2002

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API