Legal Opinion

MacKenzie v. Town Planning & Zoning Commission

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided July 27, 1962PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKing, J.

On February 23, 1960, the defendant denied the application of the plaintiff for approval of his location as an outlet for the sale of alcoholic liquor under a druggist permit. See General Statutes §§ 30-36, 30-44 (2); Trumbull Zoning Kegs. § 7 (Feb. 17, 1960); State ex rel. Spiros v. Payne, 131 Conn. 647, 648, 41 A.2d 908. The Court of Common Pleas sustained the action of the defendant, and the plaintiff has appealed.

The facts are not in dispute. On May 6, 1959, the town of Trumbull held a referendum, in accordance with General Statutes § 30-10, in which it voted to permit the sale of all…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Defelice v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1943
  2. Kutcher v. Town Planning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
  3. Preferred Accident Insurance v. Musante, Berman & Steinberg Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1947
  4. Guerriero v. GalassoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1957
  5. Lavieri v. UlyssesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1962

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Karp v. Urban Redevelopment CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
  2. Hebb v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1963
  3. Tantimonaco v. ZONING BD. OF JOHNSTONSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1967
  4. Edward Balf Co. v. Town of East GranbySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1965
  5. Marmah, Inc. v. Town of GreenwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API