Legal Opinion

Watt Samakki Dhammikaram, Inc. v. Thenjitto

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 24, 1995PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Melvin S. Barasch, J.

Plaintiff has moved by order to show cause for entry of an order (a) preventing defendant’s representatives from entering all rooms at 26 Rugby Road, Brooklyn, New York; (b) ordering defendant to relinquish possession and control of all corporate records, books, documents, financial records and checkbooks; (c) directing defendant to account to plaintiff for all corporate and religious monies received and disbursed, and (d) resign his position as a religious representative of plaintiff. By way of background, plaintiff states that it is a "not-for-profit…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In re KaminskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937
  2. Matter of KaminskyNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
  3. Kroth v. Congregation Chebra Ukadisha Bnai Israel MikalwarieNew York Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Agudist Council v. Imperial Sales Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
  5. In re LuekenNew York Supreme Court · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Kamchi v. WeissmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  2. Lendterra, Inc. v. Bais Yaakov of Brooklyn, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API