Legal Opinion
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Donald TILLE, Defendant-Appellant
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 29, 1984No. 82-1757, 82-1758PublishedCited by 86 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EUGENE A. WRIGHT, Circuit Judge:
Appellants challenge their convictions of conspiracy to violate federal anti-racketeering law. They contend that the court erred in (1) allowing Burrows’ trial on an insufficient indictment and conviction on insufficient evidence, (2) admitting into evidence various coconspirator statements, (3) admitting evidence of Tide’s flight, (4) not severing Tille’s trial from his codefendants’, and (5) instructing the jury on conspiracy.
Tille (a/k/a/ Bob Cannon) and Burrows were indicted along with two others (Satiacum and Taylor) under the Racketeer Influenced and…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States v. TurketteSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Dutton v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- United States v. Larry Allen MyersCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by86 opinions
- Salinas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- United States v. PungitoreCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- United States v. NeapolitanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- United States v. FregaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. David SilvermanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.