Legal Opinion
Andersen v. Shipowners' Ass'n of the Pacific Coast
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided March 18, 1929No. 5576PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
NORCROSS, District Judge.
-From a judgment for defendants upon trial, complainant appeals.
The bill of complaint, charging defendants with being a combination in restraint of interstate and foreign commerce, was originally dismissed by the District Court as not stating a cause of action, and upon appeal to this court was affirmed. Anderson v. Shipowners’ Ass’n (C. C. A.) 10 F.(2d) 96. Upon a writ of certiorari to the Supreme Court of the United States, the decree of dismissal was reversed. Anderson v. Shipowners’ Ass’n, 272 U. S. 359, 47 S. Ct. 125, 71 L. Ed. 298.
In the opinion of the Supreme…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. Colgate & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Second Employers'liability CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Patterson v. Bark EudoraSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Fleitmann Ex Rel. Stockholders of the Consolidated Street Lighting Co. v. Welsbach Street Lighting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Anderson v. Shipowners Assn. of Pacific CoastSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Rodgers v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1958