Ila Sands v. Sears, Roebuck & Company
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Dissent
PECK, Circuit Judge (dissenting).
I must respectfully dissent from the conclusion reached by the majority opinion, which is based upon the well established law in slip-and-fall cases holding that a business invitor is liable only for his negligence in failing to correct an improper floor condition of which he had actual or constructive knowledge. That this rule of law has been adopted by Kentucky is clearly established by the cases cited in 'the majority opinion.
Unlike the situation presented by the present record, however, each of those cases dealt with circumstances involving the presence on…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Kroger Grocery & Baking Co. v. SpillmanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1939
- Winn-Dixie Louisville, Inc. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1963
- Jones v. JarvisCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1969
- Wiggins v. ScruggsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1969
- Otto v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1956
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.