Legal Opinion

(SS) Clayton v. Commissioner of Social Security

District Court, E.D. California

Decided February 13, 2020No. 2:18-cv-03097Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 KELLY CLAYTON, o/b/o M.M.M., No. 2:18-cv-3097 AC 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of Social Security, 15 Defendant. 16 17 18 Plaintiff seeks judicial review of a final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security 19 (“Commissioner”), denying her application for Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) on behalf 20 of her child under Title XVI of the Social Security Act (the “Act”),

42 U.S.C. §§ 1381

-1383f.1 21 For the reasons that follow, the court will deny plaintiff’s motion for…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Molina v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
  3. Maureen Thomas v. Jo Anne Barnhart, Commissioner of the Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  4. Deborah L. Burch v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
  5. Orn v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API