Legal Opinion

Boyd v. Crescent Coal Co.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided January 27, 1911PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal from Muhlenberg Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Wm. Rogers Clay, Commissioner

Affirming.

Appellant, L. W. Boyd, brought this action against appellee, Crescent Co.al Company, to recover damages for personal injuries. The jury-found for defendant, and plaintiff appeals.

*788The only error relied upon is the failure of the court properly to instruct the jury.

Appellant charged in his petition that appellee’s foreman commanded and directed him to remove certain falling slate. Appellant informed the foreman that he was afraid of the roof in the mines at that point. The foreman examined the roof, and after the examination directed…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Evans Chemical Works v. BallCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
  2. Duvin Coal Company v. FikeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
  3. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co. v. ShepherdCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
  4. Green's Administrator v. C. & O. Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922
  5. McCarty v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API