Legal Opinion

Fraser v. Flanders

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided February 27, 1924PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBraley, J.

These actions are in tort for personal injuries alleged to have been caused by the negligence of the respective defendants, and, having been tried together, the verdict in the first case was for the plaintiff, and in the second case for the defendant.

At the close of the evidence in the first case the defendant asked for the following rulings:

“1. On all the evidence the plaintiff is not entitled to recover from the defendant Flanders.
“ 2. On all the evidence the defendant Flanders had the right of way over the defendant Dunn and exercised it, and the law providing for precedence over the other…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hennessey v. TaylorMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
  2. Feneff v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1907
  3. Lynn Gas & Electric Co. v. Meriden Fire InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1893
  4. Finnegan v. Winslow Skate Manufacturing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
  5. Lopes v. ConnollyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1912

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. McDonald v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
  2. Langan v. PianowskiMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  3. Hall v. ShainMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  4. Eammes v. CaplanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1925
  5. Deguio v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API