Legal Opinion

Eammes v. Caplan

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided April 18, 1925PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBraley, J.

These actions of tort for personal injuries were tried together, and, the plaintiffs having prevailed, the defendants contend that the verdicts should be set aside because there was no evidence of their due care, or of his negligence.

The accident happened in broad daylight at the intersection of Bromfield and Tremont streets in the city of Boston. The plaintiffs, who were pedestrians, on their way from School Street on the left hand side of Tremont Street to a point beyond Bromfield Street, had reached the cross walk on Bromfield Street, where they noticed that pedestrians were passing over…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Hennessey v. TaylorMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
  2. Trombley v. Stevens-Duryea Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
  3. Finnegan v. Winslow Skate Manufacturing Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
  4. Heywood v. OgasapianMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1916
  5. Breen v. Dedham Water Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1922

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. ThornsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  2. Commonwealth v. GraftonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2018
  3. Kotler v. LalleySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
  4. Moran v. BrodeurMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1927
  5. O'Brien v. GuitermanMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1926

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API