Legal Opinion

Haynes v. Holstein

Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit

Decided February 22, 2007No. 06-8022Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

By order of the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel, the precedential effect of this decision is limited to the case and parties pursuant to 6th Cir. BAP LBR 8013-1(b). See also 6th Cir. BAP LBR 8010-1(c). File Name: 07b0005n.06 BANKRUPTCY APPELLATE PANEL OF THE SIXTH CIRCUIT In re: CRESCENT COMMUNITIES, INC., ) ) Debtor. ) ______________________________________ ) ) ELEANOR BEAVERS HAYNES, ) ) Plaintiff-Appellee, ) No. 06-8022 ) v. ) ) JACK D. HOLSTEIN, ) ) Defendant-Appellant. ) ______________________________________ ) Appeal from the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Ohio,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. BFP v. Resolution Trust CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Midland Asphalt Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API