Legal Opinion

McCreary v. Bomberger

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 3, 1892No. Appeal, No. 5PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal, No. 5, May T., 1892, by plaintiff, John McCreary, from judgment for defendant non obstante veredicto, of C. P. Dauphin Co., June T., 1891, No. 433, on verdict for plaintiff. Scire facias sur mortgage with notice to Commonwealth Guarantee Trust & Safe Deposit Co., trustee, and John E. Patterson, guardian ad litem of minor heirs, devisees under will of Lewis Bomberger, deceased.

Read the full summary

Appeal, No. 5, May T., 1892, by plaintiff, John McCreary, from judgment for defendant non obstante veredicto, of C. P. Dauphin Co., June T., 1891, No. 433, on verdict for plaintiff. Scire facias sur mortgage with notice to Commonwealth Guarantee Trust & Safe Deposit Co., trustee, and John E. Patterson, guardian ad litem of minor heirs, devisees under will of Lewis Bomberger, deceased. The facts appear by the opinion of the Supreme Court- The court charged the jury as follows: “ This case raises questions of law which will have to be determined by the court hereafter when we have more leisure…

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mb. Chief Justice Paxson,

The learned judge below instructed the jury to find a verdict for the plaintiff subject to the reserved question whether there was any evidence in the case to sustain such verdict. Subsequently he entered judgment for the defendant non obstante veredicto.

The learned judge was of the opinion that Sarah Bomberger took but a life estate in the land in question under the will of her husband, Lewis Bomberger. The will, so far as it applies to the present case, is as follows:

“ I give, devise, and bequeath to my beloved wife, Sarah Bomberger, my house and lot in…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lancaster v. DolanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1829
  2. Jones v. WoodSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1851
  3. Hay v. MayerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1839

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Davis v. Pennsylvania Co., Etc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  2. Hamilton v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
  3. Stannert's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
  4. Hupp v. Union Coal & Coke Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  5. Holland v. Bogardus-Hill Drug Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1926

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API