Hi-Speed Auto Wash, Inc. v. Simeri
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtGarrard, J.
Appellee Simeri recovered a judgment for personal injury sustained at Hi-Speed’s carwash. Hi-Speed’s appeal challenges the sufficiency of the evidence to establish negligence. It also asserts that if it was negligent a fortiori, Simeri was contributorily negligent. We find the evidence *118was sufficient to go to the jury on both questions. Accordingly, we affirm.
The evidence disclosed that Simeri had patronized the car-wash on previous occasions. On March 27, 1973, he drove to the carwash to have his automobile washed and cleaned. He drove into the entrance and stopped where a sign indicated. An…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- STALLINGS v. DickIndiana Court of Appeals · 1965
- Hedgecock v. OrloskyIndiana Supreme Court · 1942
- Robertson Bros. Dept. Store v. StanleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1950
- Riesbeck Drug Co. v. Wray, Admx.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1942
- Rouch v. BisigIndiana Court of Appeals · 1970
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Kroger Co. v. HaunIndiana Court of Appeals · 1978
- Plan-Tec, Inc. v. WigginsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
- Howard v. H.J. Ricks Construction Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1987
- Bd. of Com'rs of Monroe Cty. v. HattonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
- Phillips v. CroyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1977
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.