Aschan v. State
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the Court
LAVORATO, Justice.
Iowa Code section 663A.2(6) (1987) permits prisoners to challenge forfeiture of good conduct time through postconviction proceedings provided they first exhaust the appeal procedure of section 903A.3(2). Section 903A.3(2) provides that orders of the hearing officer are subject to appeal to the superintendent or warden. It also provides that the decisions of the superintendent or warden are subject to review by the director of the Iowa department of corrections.
Because section 663A.2(6) uses the word “appeal,” the postconviction applicant, Mark Aschan I, contended prisoners…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Harden v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1989
- Rowen v. LeMars Mutual Insurance Co. of IowaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1975
- City of Des Moines v. Des Moines Police Bargaining Unit Ass'nSupreme Court of Iowa · 1985
- Welp v. Iowa Department of RevenueSupreme Court of Iowa · 1983
- Ellsworth v. Ins. Co. of North AmericaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Iowa Coal Mining Co. v. Monroe CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1996
- L.C. Markham v. Dick Clark, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Office of Citizens' Aide/Ombudsman v. Deb Edwards and Iowa Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Iowa · 2012
- James v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 1991
- Keokuk County v. H.B.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1999
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.