Morris v. Cadence Design Systems, Inc.

MEMORANDUM *

Appellant James B. Moms, Jr. appeals the district court’s order granting Appellee Cadence Design System’s (“Cadence”) motion for summary judgment and dismissing Appellant Morris’s claims because Morris lacked standing to assert those claims. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and we affirm.

Morris’s claims arise out of his contention that Cadence breached certain provisions of a Product Purchase, Manufacturing and Distribution Agreement *1000(“Cadence-Simutech Agreement” or “Agreement”), entered into by Cadence and Simutech on November 5, 1999. It is important to note that…