People v. Daniel R.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
JOHNSON, J.
The central issue in this appeal is whether the crime of assault with a deadly weapon (Pen. Code, § 245, subd. (a)(1)) is a lesser and necessarily included offense of willfully and maliciously discharging a firearm at an occupied vehicle (Pen. Code, § 246). We hold assault with a deadly weapon is not necessarily included in the offense of discharging a firearm at an occupied vehicle. We therefore reverse the adjudication of wardship in this case.
Facts and Proceedings Below
Defendant, Daniel R., was charged in a petition pursuant to Welfare and Institutions Code section 602…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- People v. WestCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- People v. FrancisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Bunnell v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- People v. MarshallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- People v. LicasCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
- United States v. Luis Narvaez-Gomez, AKA Manuel Gomez-FelizCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- In re HansenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- In re HansenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- People v. GambleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.