Legal Opinion
Jarnutowski v. Pratt & Whitney
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided May 4, 2015No. Civil No. 3:13-cv-100(AVC)PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON THE DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
ALFRED V. COVELLO, District Judge.
This is an action for damages in which the plaintiff, David Jarnutowski, alleges that the defendant, Pratt & Whitney (“Pratt”), unlawfully terminated his employment on the basis of his age. It is brought pursuant to the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”)1 and common law tenets concerning breach of contract, promissory estoppel, and breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing.
Pratt has filed the within motion for summary judgment on all counts pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of…
2Cases cited55 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- International Building Supply, LLC f/k/a International Supply, LLC, et al. v. Hudson Meridian Construction Group, LLCDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2025
- Lee v. Yale UniversityDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2022