Legal Opinion

United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Industrial Commission

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided February 3, 1977No. 1 CA-IC 1539PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FROEB, Chief Judge.

We are asked to determine in this case whether the petitioning insurance carrier must provide coverage for death benefits.

The covered employee, Gary R. Austin, died in an accident on September 7, 1974, while driving a truck for General Transportation, Inc. (referred to as “General”). His widow and six children surviving him thereafter filed a claim pursuant to appropriate provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Act of Arizona.

*474Several weeks before the accident, action was taken by the insurance brokerage company representing General to shift workmen’s compensation…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Micucci v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Bedwell v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Northern Insurance Co. of New York v. MabryCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
  4. Home Accident Insurance v. PleasantArizona Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Ezell v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Carousel Snack Bar v. Industrial CommissionArizona Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Phelps v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONAArizona Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Doss v. walmart/claims MgtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
  4. Phelps v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N OF ARIZONAArizona Supreme Court · 1987

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API