Legal Opinion

State v. Walden

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided May 19, 1981No. 8013SC1037PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, (Robert M.) Judge.

At the onset, we note that defendant’s appeal is not properly before us. According to G.S. 15A-979(b), as interpreted by our *127Supreme Court in State v. Reynolds, 298 N.C. 380, 259 S.E. 2d 843 (1979), U.S. cert. denied, the defendant must notify the district attorney and the trial court of his intention to appeal the denial of the suppression motion at the sentencing hearing. See also State v. Afflerback, 46 N.C. App. 344, 264 S.E. 2d 784 (1980); State v. Trapper, 48 N.C. App. 481, 269 S.E. 2d 680 (1980), (appeal pending in U.S. Supreme Court). In the case sub judice…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. State v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  2. State v. CollinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  3. State v. TrapperCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  4. State v. WootenCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
  5. State v. AfflerbackCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. McBrideCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1995
  2. State v. AtwellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1983
  3. State v. BannerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API