Legal Opinion
In re Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided March 4, 1930No. 21507PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KERRIGAN, District Judge.
An order to show cause has issued, directed to the respondent E. T. O’Donnell to show cause why he should not be ordered to produce certain books and records of the Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Company, and be sworn and testify on an application for a search warrant made by the United States attorney to one of the United States commissioners for this district, and why he should not be held in contempt for disobedience of a subpcena issued by the commissioner.
The commissioner’s certificate, upon which the order to show cause is based, states that application for a…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Hale v. HenkelSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Ex Parte Bakelite Corp'n.Supreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Smith v. WhitneySupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Todd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- State v. BaltesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1924
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Field v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
- Hansen v. BlackmonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1942