Legal Opinion

Terrell, Receiver v. Russell

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 9, 1897PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Ebbob from Bexar. Tried below before Hon. J. L. Camp.

1Opinion of the Court

JAMES,

Chief Justice.—Action for damages for death from personal injury. Our conclusions of fact are as follows: We conclude that McMaster Russell, defendant in error’s husband, ivas killed by being run over by the receiver’s engine, while in the receiver’s employ, and in the discharge of his duties as a brakeman. Also that there is evidence to show that the engineer, Pareira, then operating the engine, was incompetent by reason of recklessness, and that his negligence on this occasion, growing out of such unfitness, caused. Russell’s death; that there is evidence that warranted a finding that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Simpson v. BrothertonTexas Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Dallas City Railroad v. BeemanTexas Supreme Court · 1889

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. El Paso & Southwestern Railway Co. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1908
  2. Exporters' & Traders' Compress & Warehouse Co. v. ShawCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1929
  3. Southern Kansas Railway Co. v. CrumpCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API