Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Robert E. Banks v. Julie L. Jones, Secretary, etc.

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 12, 2016No. 1D15-0330Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partWolf, J.

I concur in that portion of the majority opinion that determines that this particular inmate is not entitled to relief. I also concur in the decision to declare conflict with the Fifth District Court of Appeal’s decision in Holland v. State, 791 So.2d 1256 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001). I would additionally certify a question of great public importance concerning the appropriate method and scope of judicial review of decisions to segregate prisoners from the general population. I respectfully dissent from the decision to overturn almost 35 years of precedent which allowed inmates to file habeas corpus…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Wilkinson v. AustinSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  4. Arizona v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. Arizona v. RumseySupreme Court of the United States · 1984

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API