Legal Opinion
McNeill v. City of Tulsa
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided January 13, 1998No. 87119Published
1Opinion of the Court
953 P.2d 329 (1998)
1998 OK 2
N.E. McNEILL, Jr., on his own behalf and as Class Representative, Respondent,
v.
CITY OF TULSA; Municipal Employees Retirement Plan Board of Trustees, and Larry Stovall, Employee Benefit Manager, Petitioners.
No. 87119.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma.
January 13, 1998.
David L. Pauling, Michael C. Romig, Tulsa, for Petitioners.
James R. Eagleton, Eagleton, Eagleton & Harrison, Inc., Tulsa, for Respondents.
SIMMS, Justice.
¶ 1 City of Tulsa and its Retirement Plan seek our review of the trial court's certified interlocutory order finding that 72 O.S.1991 § 67.13a, which grants…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Chevron Oil Co. v. HusonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- McNeill v. City of TulsaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1998
- Allen v. State Ex Rel. Board of Trustees of the Oklahoma Uniform Retirement System for Justices & JudgesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1988
- Campbell v. WhiteSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
- Cave Springs Public School District I-30 v. BlairSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1980
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.