Legal Opinion

Jensen v. Nielsen

Utah Supreme Court

Decided May 27, 1971No. 12160PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CROCKETT, Justice:

The plaintiffs Jensen, who had purchased the “Nelson Motor Court” in Panguitch from the defendants, after complying with notice to vacate the property, sued to recover back part of the payments they had made under the purchase contract. Their stated theory is that inasmuch as defendants got their property back, in equity and good conscience they should be required to reimburse to the plaintiffs all payments made, less only the reasonable rental value and any loss accruing to defendants during plaintiffs’ occupancy. Upon a plenary trial the district court found the issues…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Perkins v. SpencerUtah Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Jacobson v. SwanUtah Supreme Court · 1954
  3. Austad v. AustadUtah Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Wiese v. WieseUtah Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Malmberg v. BaughUtah Supreme Court · 1923

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. In Re BoothUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Utah · 1982
  2. United States v. LoosleyUtah Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Bellon v. MalnarUtah Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Warner v. RasmussenUtah Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Williamson v. WanlassUtah Supreme Court · 1976

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API