Legal Opinion

DO NOT FILE IN THIS CASE TRANSFERRED TO CAMDEN - NEW CIVIL ACTION NO. 1:23-cv-18091

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided March 7, 2024No. 3:23-cv-18091Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY CELLCO PARTNERSHIP AND Civ. No. 23-18091 (MAS)(JBD) NEW YORK SMSA LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, d/b/a VERIZON WIRELESS, MEMORANDUM ORDER Plaintiffs, v. THE COUNTY OF MONMOUTH, NEW JERSEY, et al., Defendants, Plaintiffs Cellco Partnership and New York SMSA Limited Partnership, both d/b/a Verizon Wireless (hereafter, “Verizon”) filed this action under the Telecommunications Act of 1996, No. 104-104,

110 Stat. 56

(1996) (“TCA”) against defendants—the County of Monmouth, New Jersey; the Monmouth County Board of Commissioners; and five Monmouth County…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Harris v. PernsleyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
  2. Brody v. SpangCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
  3. United States v. Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
  4. King v. Governor of the State of New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
  5. Mountain Top Condominium Ass'n v. Dave Stabbert Master Builder, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API