Legal Opinion

State v. Bischoff

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided June 12, 2018No. AC39336PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSheldon, J.

The defendant, Haji Jhmalah Bischoff, appeals from the judgment of conviction, rendered against him after a jury trial in the judicial district of Fairfield, on charges of possession of narcotics in violation of General Statutes (Rev. to 2013)

§ 21a-279 (a) and possession of less than four ounces of a cannabis-type substance (marijuana) in violation of General Statutes (Rev. to 2013) § 21a-279 (c). The defendant claims that (1) the evidence presented at trial was insufficient to support his conviction of possession of narcotics; (2) the trial court erred in failing to instruct the jury, as he…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. MooreConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. BischoffSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2021
  2. State v. DawsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2021
  3. State v. BischoffConnecticut Appellate Court · 2019
  4. State v. BischoffSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2018
  5. State v. PorfilConnecticut Appellate Court · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API