Legal Opinion

A. Johnson & Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided May 6, 1976No. C.D. 4650; Court Nos. 70/19276, etcPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Richardson, Judge:

The merchandise in this case, described on commercial invoices as Mairon Electrolytic Iron Cathode Plate or Mairon Electrolytic Iron Flake, was exported from Japan in 1969 and 1970, and classified in liquidation under TSUS item 657.20 as modified by T.D. 68-9 as articles of iron at the duty rate of 13 or 15 per centum ad valorem, depending upon date of entry. * It is alleged that the merchandise should be classified under TSUS item 415.50 as modified by T.D. 68-9 as chemical elements in any physical form at the duty rate of 7 or 8 per centum ad valorem, depending upon date…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Junge v. HeddenSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Goat & Sheepskin Import Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914
  3. Industrial Chemical & Dye Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. A. Johnson & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1978
  2. United States v. A. Johnson & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API