Legal Opinion

United States v. A. Johnson & Co.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided August 4, 1977No. C.A.D. 1196; No. 76-29PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rich, Judge.

This appeal is from the judgment of the United States Customs Court, 76 Cust. Ct. 155, C.D. 4650, 417 F. Supp. 1026 (1976), sustaining consolidated protests by the importer, A. Johnson & Co., Inc. (Johnson), to the classification of electrolytic iron in flake form imported from Japan. We reverse and remand.

The imported merchandise is invoiced, inter alia, as “Mairon Electrolytic Iron Flake,” “Mairon” being a proprietary name by which we shall hereinafter identify the merchandise imported. Mairon is produced from a solid, zinc-ore residue by reducing the iron content thereof to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. A. Johnson & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1976

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. A. Johnson & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1978
  2. Meta Platforms, Inc. v. QibaaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2025
  3. United States v. BradleyDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API