Legal Opinion

Weierman v. Mardis

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided May 11, 1994No. C-930216PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Hildebrandt, Presiding Judge.

The issues in this will-contest action are twofold and concern discovery orders issued by the probate court. Our review focuses on two questions: (1) Did the probate court err by ruling that the testator’s treating physicians and the contestor’s experts could review the testator’s medical records for purposes of testifying at trial? and (2) Did the court err by ruling that the contestor could depose an attorney concerning his representation of the guardian and successor guardian of the testator’s estate prior to the testator’s death? For the reasons that follow,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Peyko v. FrederickOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Heiselmann v. FranksOhio Court of Appeals · 1934

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Nester v. Lima Memorial HospitalOhio Court of Appeals · 2000
  2. Patterson v. Zdanski, Unpublished Decision (9-30-2003)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. Torres Friedenberg v. Friedenberg (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2020
  4. Cargile v. BarrowOhio Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. Penwell v. NanavatiOhio Court of Appeals · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API