Legal Opinion

Tan-Kar Oil Co. v. Danley

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 24, 1940No. 3 Div. 317PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LIVINGSTON, Justice.

The Tan-Kar Oil Company, a corporation, filed its bill of complaint in the Circuit Court of Autauga County, Alabama, in equity, against W. H. Danley and Bessie Danley, seeking specific performance of a contract to sell real estate.

The bill of complaint was amended by making L. A. Cherry a party respondent. The amendment alleged that, since the commencement of this suit, W. H. Danley and Bessie Danley conveyed the real estate here involved to the said L. A. Cherry, who bought the same with knowledge of complainant’s rights therein.

The contract which is made the foundation…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Minge v. GreenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
  2. Lavretta v. First Nat. Bank of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  3. South v. First Nat. BankAlabama Court of Appeals · 1920

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Gordon v. Central Park Little Boys LeagueSupreme Court of Alabama · 1960
  2. Ivey v. WigginsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1961
  3. Goltsman v. American Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1946
  4. Tillman v. Calhoun Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1944
  5. Hemphill v. Hunter-Benn & Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API