Legal Opinion

Hemphill v. Hunter-Benn & Co.

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 16, 1941No. 1 Div. 143PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LIVINGSTON, Justice.

The basis of plaintiff’s cause of action as set forth in the several counts of the complaint is a contract entered into between plaintiff and defendant on February 7, 1923, which is marked Exhibit “A”, attached to and made a part of the complaint, together with a supplemental agreement between the same parties, dated December 9, 1924, marked Exhibit “B”, attached to and made a part of the complaint, and a mortgage executed by the Bassett Lumber Company to defendant on July 3, 1926, marked Exhibit “C”, attached to and made a part of the complaint.

For the purposes of this…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hunter-Benn Co. Company v. Bassett Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1932
  2. Lavretta v. First Nat. Bank of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1937
  3. South v. First Nat. BankAlabama Court of Appeals · 1920
  4. Tan-Kar Oil Co. v. DanleySupreme Court of Alabama · 1940
  5. Bassett Lumber Co. v. Hunter-Benn Co. CompanySupreme Court of Alabama · 1939

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gordon v. Central Park Little Boys LeagueSupreme Court of Alabama · 1960
  2. Waugaman v. Skyline Country ClubSupreme Court of Alabama · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API