Legal Opinion
Wood v. Hayes
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided February 15, 1940No. 13133PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Grice, Justice.
The deed referred to in the foregoing statement of facts begins with the recital that it is an indenture between “Mrs. Cora B. Mercer of the one part, and.Randall Hayes and Edna Hayes, his wife, and their daughter, Ruby Hayes, as hereinafter provided, of the other partand f ollowing the description of the granted premises occurs this language: “It is the purpose of this deed to convey a one-half undivided interest in the above-described property to each grantee Randall and Edna Hayes. Should either Randall Hayes or Edna Hayes die not having conveyed his or her interest, in that…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Russell v. Mohr-Weil Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1897
- Burns v. HaleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1926
- Glover v. NewsomeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1910
- Atlanta Northern Railway Co. v. HarrisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1917
- English v. LittleSupreme Court of Georgia · 1927
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ayers v. YoungSupreme Court of Georgia · 1954
- Bowles v. WhiteSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
- Collier v. Dejarnette Supply Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1942
- Pearson v. GeorgeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1954