Legal Opinion · Dissent

Schultz v. Garrett

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 3, 1983No. 82-1574Published

1DissentHolmes, J.

The issue presented is whether the legislative amendment to a limiting factor of the municipal court clerk’s salary formula, which has the direct effect of increasing the clerk’s salary during term, is prohibited by the Constitution.

I must affirm the court of appeals in that the appellant is seeking to receive an in-term increase in compensation as Clerk of the Springfield Municipal Court by way of a legislative enactment contrary to Section 20, Article II of the Ohio Constitution.

The increase sought here is based upon legislation which amended R.C. *136325.08, which section provided for…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. MacK v. GuckenbergerOhio Supreme Court · 1942
  2. State ex rel. Artmayer v. Bd. of TrusteesOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  3. State ex rel. Edgecomb v. RosenOhio Supreme Court · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API