Legal Opinion

Keyes v. Konkel

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 23, 1899PublishedCited by 23 opinions

Error to Saginaw; Wilber, J. Replevin by John Keyes against Xavier B. Konkel and another. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtMontgomery, J.

This is an action of replevin to recover the dead body of plaintiff’s brother. The deceased died at a hospital, and defendants, who are undertakers, took charge of the corpse by request of the hospital authorities. The plaintiff, after the defendants had performed some services in fitting the body for burial, demanded possession of the body, and defendants refused to deliver the body up unless paid for their services. Thereupon plaintiff instituted this suit.

The question presented is whether replevin will lie in this State for a human corpse. The question is happily more novel than difficult.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Larson v. ChaseSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
  2. Foley v. PhelpsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
  3. Burney v. Children's HospitalMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1897
  4. Weld v. WalkerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1881
  5. Guthrie v. WeaverMissouri Court of Appeals · 1876

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Waeschle v. DragovicCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
  2. Koerber v. PatekWisconsin Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Melfi v. Mount Sinai HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  4. Allinger v. KellMichigan Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. Whaley v. County of TuscolaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1995

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API