Legal Opinion

Whaley v. County of Tuscola

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided July 12, 1995No. 94-1451PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BAILEY BROWN, Circuit Judge.

The plaintiffs brought these § 1983 actions claiming that the defendants violated their Fourteenth Amendment procedural due process rights by removing the corneas or eyeballs of their recently deceased relatives. The interesting question raised in this consolidated appeal is what relief the Constitu*1113tion might provide when a state actor steals the eyes of a dead mam Specifically, we must decide whether Michigan law provides the next of kin with a constitutionally protected property interest in a deceased relative’s body, including the eyes. The district court…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Paul v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Memphis Light, Gas & Water Division v. CraftSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Scarpaci v. Milwaukee CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Rebecca Judge v. City of LowellCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1998
  2. Waeschle v. DragovicCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2009
  3. Linda F. Seals v. H & F, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Crocker v. PleasantSupreme Court of Florida · 2001
  5. Karen Waeschle v. Ljubisa Dragovic, M.D.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API