Legal Opinion

Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. v. Intel Corp.

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided June 4, 2008No. Civil Action Nos. 05-441-JJF, 05-485-JJF; MDL No. 05-1717-JJFPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

JOSEPH J. FAENAN, Jr., District Judge.

WHEREAS, the Special Master issued a Report and Recommendation (D.I. 641 in Civ. Act. No. 05-441; D.I. 743 in Civ. Act. No. 05-485; D.I. 903 in MDL No. 05-1717) concerning the Motion of AMD and Class Plaintiffs to compel Intel to produce the notes of Intel’s counsel investigation interviews of designated employees conducted by Intel’s counsel concerning Intel’s compliance with its evidence preservation obligations (“DM 4A”);

WHEREAS, the Special Master also issued sealed Findings and Recommendations Regarding The Declaration Of David J. Lender (D.I.…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. Diversified Industries, Inc. v. The Honorable James H. Meredith, Chief Judge of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of MissouriCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978
  4. Hearn v. RhayDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 1975
  5. In Re Claus Von Bulow, Martha Von Bulow, by Her Next Friends Alexander Auersperg, and Annie Laurie Auersperg-Kneissl v. Claus Von BulowCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Barko v. Halliburton Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 2014
  2. Davis v. Gas Recovery, LLCDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API