Legal Opinion
In re the Liquidation of the State Bank of Binghamton
New York Supreme Court
Decided July 7, 1934PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPersonius, J.
Separate petitions were presented with notices of motion returnable in Broome county July 7, 1933. The matters were continued and finally submitted November thirteenth.
Two preferred claims are involved, one presented by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, and the other by Dillon, Read & Co. Each motion is for instructions; each petition asks that the claimant be denied priority.
*581The State Bank of Binghamton, hereinafter called State Bank, was open until the close of business Saturday, December 13, 1930, but failed to open Monday morning, December fifteenth. The petitioner, then took charge.…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Drinkall v. Movius State BankNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1901
- Geo. F. Malcolm, Inc. v. Burlington, C., Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1934
- Steinmetz v. SchultzSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1932
- Jones v. Board of Education of Union Free School District No. 1Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934
- In re Jayne & MasonNew York Supreme Court · 1931
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Rose Check Cashing Service, Inc. v. Chemical Bank New York Trust Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1964
- Chase Manhattan Bank (National Ass'n) v. HobbsCivil Court of the City of New York · 1978
- Empire National Bank v. Monahan, New York County Courts1975
- Buscaglia v. Tribunal de Contribuciones de Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1945
- Robert Arnold Manufacturing Co. v. Troy Associates, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1962
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.