Legal Opinion
Geo. F. Malcolm, Inc. v. Burlington, C., Co.
New Jersey Court of Chancery
Decided January 24, 1934PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The bill is to impress a lien upon the assets of the defunct Burlington City Loan and Trust Company, now in the hands of the commissioner of banking and insurance.
The Neidich Process Company drew its check upon the Burlington City Loan and Trust Company (called Burlington Bank) to the order of the complainant, George F. Malcolm, Incorporated, of Boston, for $1,327.97. The check was deposited by the complainant in the State Street Trust Company of Boston (called Boston Bank) and forwarded through the usual banking channels to the Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia (called Philadelphia Bank)…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Federal Reserve Bank of Richmond v. MalloySupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Trust Co. of N.J. v. McGuinnessNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1928
3Cited by16 opinions
- Deerhurst Estates v. Meadow Homes, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
- Allstate Ins. Co. v. Howard Savings Inst.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1974
- City of Jersey City v. Roosevelt Stadium Marina, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1986
- Shebar v. Sanyo Business Systems Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1987
- In re the Liquidation of the State Bank of BinghamtonNew York Supreme Court · 1934
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.