Legal Opinion

Baer v. Schaap

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided December 9, 1960No. 34497PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSimmons, C. J.

This is an action for damages for personal injuries. Our first decision in this case is found in Baer v. Schaap, 168 Neb. 578, 97 N. W. 2d 207. A rehearing was granted. The motion for rehearing presents only two questions. The first is the sufficiency of the evidence to justify submitting the cause to the jury. We now find it necessary to decide only that question. We conclude that our former decision was in error in holding the evidence sufficient. That decision is set aside.

We reverse the judgment and remand the cause with directions to sustain the motion for a directed verdict.

We refer to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Kaufman v. Baltimore Transit Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1975
  2. Kucaba v. KucabaNebraska Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Hegarty v. BergerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  4. Butler v. Reed-Avery Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1946
  5. Corbitt v. Omaha Transit Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1956

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of PriceNebraska Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Wray M. Scott Co. v. DaigleCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1962
  3. Petracek v. Haas O.K. Rubber Welders, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1964
  4. K N Energy, Inc. v. Cities of Broken BowNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Carson v. SteinkeNebraska Supreme Court · 2023

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API