Legal Opinion

Miller v. Commonwealth

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided May 30, 1913PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Casey Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion op the Court by

Judge Miller

— Affirming.

The indictment charged appellant with having seduced a female under twenty-one years of age. Section 1214 of the Kentucky Statutes, reads as follows:

“Whoever shall, under promise of marriage, seduce and have carnal knowlédge of any female under twenty-one years of age, shall he guilty of a felony and, upon conviction therefor, shall he confined in the penitentiary not less than one year nor more than five years. No prosecution shall he instituted where the person charged shall have married the girl seduced, or offer and he willing to marry her,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Dial v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
  2. Commonwealth v. TobinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
  3. Stewart v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
  4. Commonwealth v. McNuttCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1909

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. McCreary v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
  2. McCreary v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
  3. Hoskins v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920
  4. Coleman v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914
  5. Bush v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1924

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API