Legal Opinion
Keepseagle v. Vilsack
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided November 7, 2014No. Civil Action No. 99-3119 (EGS)PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Emmet G. Sullivan, United States District Judge
Pending before the Court are two motions to intervene in this ease. Both groups of putative intervenors seek to participate in proceedings regarding the Court’s consideration of a pending motion to modify the cy pres provisions of the 2011 agreement that resulted in the settlement of this class action (“the Agreement”). First, the Choctaw Nation of Oklahoma and its affiliated Jones Academy Foundation (“the Choctaw Mov-ants”) seek to intervene on the basis of their concern that the proposed modification will adversely affect…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Clapper v. Amnesty International USASupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug StoresSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Devlin v. ScardellettiSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Fund for Animals, Inc. v. NortonCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
- Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. National Children's Center, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Keepseagle v. VilsackDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Keepseagle v. VilsackDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Keepseagle v. VilsackDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
- Smallwood v. LynchDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Keeps Eagle v. VenemanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.