Legal Opinion

Maribu v. Nohowec

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 2, 1937PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtHooley, J.

This is the return of an order to show cause, first, why the award of a contract for the construction of a well and pumping equipment in the village of Mineóla by the board of trustees of the incorporated village of Mineóla to the Layne New York Co., Inc., should not be declared null and void, and, second, why the defendants, constituting the board of trustees of the incorporated village of Mineóla, should not be enjoined and restrained during the pendency of this action and until the entry of final judgment herein, from taking any action intended, calculated or designed to carry into effect…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. City of Trenton v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. County of Suffolk v. Water Power & Control CommissionNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
  3. A. W. Dovel Co. v. Village of LynbrookAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1925
  4. In re South Market StreetNew York Supreme Court · 1894
  5. Village of Massena v. St. Lawrence Water Co.New York Supreme Court · 1926

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Marino v. Town of RamapoNew York Supreme Court · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API