Legal Opinion

A. W. Dovel Co. v. Village of Lynbrook

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 29, 1925PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

If the method of proceeding by the board of trustees in advertising and awarding these public contracts were governed by any statute, there might be some force in petitioner’s contention, but neither section 88 of the General Municipal Law (as added by Laws of 1921, chap. 469), nor any provision of the Village Law, under which the village of Lynbrook is organized, requires these contracts *571to be awarded after advertisement and competitive bidding. The General Municipal Law simply requires separate and independent bidding for the different classes of work and the awarding of the contract to a…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Barhite v. Home Telephone Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1900
  2. Kingsley v. . City of BrooklynNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  3. Terrell v. StrongNew York Supreme Court · 1895
  4. People ex rel. Weiss v. City of BuffaloNew York Supreme Court · 1901

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Connelly v. City of ElmiraNew York Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Maribu v. NohowecNew York Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Bohn v. Salt Lake CityUtah Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Opn. No., New York Attorney General Reports1981
  5. Ross v. WilsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API