Szirtes v. Bly
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the plaintiff, Louis Szirtes, from an order of the Supreme Court, made at the New York Special Term and entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 3d day of October, 1918, denying a motion that the attorney for the defendants Bly be required to accept and receive a supplemental complaint herein.
1Opinion of the Court
Page, J.:
The action was originally commenced against the defendants Ely and Dry Dock Savings Institution to recover the sum of money on deposit with the said Dry Dock Savings Institution. After issue was joined by the service of the answer of the defendants Ely, the defendant Dry Dock Savings Institution procured an order from one of the justices of this court at Special Term, Part II, pursuant to section 250 of the Banking Law (Consol. Laws, chap. 2; Laws of 1914, chap. 369), which provides as follows:
“ In all actions against any savings bank to recover for moneys on deposit therewith, if…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Fleischmann v. . BennettNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
- Goldreyer v. FoleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1913
- Pinckney v. HagermanNew York Supreme Court · 1871
- Becker v. . StudemanNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
- Becker v. StudemanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1903
3Cited by2 opinions
- Fox v. McGrathCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
- Mainzer v. AvrilNew York Supreme Court · 1919