Legal Opinion

Mainzer v. Avril

New York Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1919PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Action in partition.

1Opinion of the CourtCropsey, J.

In this action in partition, the only question is which of two women is the lawful wife of the defendant Jacob Avril. He married both of them under the following circumstances: In 1892 he married Josephine K. Avril. Some ten years later she was adjudged an incompetent. Some ten or eleven years thereafter an action was brought in the name of Josephine K. Avril, by her duly appointed guardian ad litem, against Jacob Avril to obtain a divorce. While this action was pending, the guardian ad litem for Josephine was appointed committee of her person and property. Later a final judgment of divorce…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ackerman v. . TrueNew York Court of Appeals · 1903
  2. Mohler v. Estate of ShankSupreme Court of Iowa · 1895
  3. Wadsworth v. . Sharpsteen and MoffatNew York Court of Appeals · 1853
  4. Walter v. . WalterNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
  5. Iago v. IagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1897

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Eichner v. DillonNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. Mohrmann v. KobNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
  3. In re the Accounting of BarlettaNew York Surrogate's Court · 1956
  4. In re the Estate of GrantNew York Surrogate's Court · 1924
  5. Mohrmann v. KobAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1942

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API